Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SC refuses to hear New York and Connecticut bans onmilitary-style assault weapons

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    SC refuses to hear New York and Connecticut bans onmilitary-style assault weapons

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday left in place gun control laws in New York and Connecticut that ban military-style assault weapons like the one used in last week's massacre at an Orlando nightclub, rejecting a legal challenge by gun rights advocates.
    https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-supreme...134132044.html

    This is why the ISRA or NRA won't take the FOID to the SC. ILL does not have a chance in Hell of getting the FOID defeated.
    TO BE UNARMED IS TO BE A VICTIM

    #2
    Re: SC refuses to hear New York and Connecticut bans onmilitary-style assault weapon

    Right now, it wouldn't do any good for them to hear it. The vote would be 4/4 & that would mean it would revert back to last court decision. Best to wait on any appeals, if time limit permits, until we can get a conservative judge appointed. 'Course, if the GOP committee screws Trump out of the nomination & gets one of their rinos on the ballet, kiss that possibility goodbye.
    Think Green.......Recycle Congress

    Certified Armed Infidel

    Right Wing Extremist

    Comment


      #3
      Re: SC refuses to hear New York and Connecticut bans onmilitary-style assault weapon

      Originally posted by mitchr View Post
      Right now, it wouldn't do any good for them to hear it. The vote would be 4/4 & that would mean it would revert back to last court decision. Best to wait on any appeals, if time limit permits, until we can get a conservative judge appointed. 'Course, if the GOP committee screws Trump out of the nomination & gets one of their rinos on the ballet, kiss that possibility goodbye.
      I can hear Obummer now "See? I told you GOP to confirm my conservative picks for the Scotus. Now you'll pay"

      Dark times will befall us.

      Comment


        #4
        Re: SC refuses to hear New York and Connecticut bans onmilitary-style assault weapon

        Prez wouldn't know a conservative judge if he was to trip over him.
        Think Green.......Recycle Congress

        Certified Armed Infidel

        Right Wing Extremist

        Comment


          #5
          Re: SC refuses to hear New York and Connecticut bans onmilitary-style assault weapon

          I dont trust Trump. But as long as we can keep a pro gun pro constitution senate and house SCOTUS nor Pres can do much damage.
          SCOTUS cant make law and can only rule on laws congress passes.
          And congress can repeal any law it wishes too.
          Nor would congress have to replace Scalia if it doesnt they dont want too.
          You dont have to believe a train is coming to be run over by it.

          Comment


            #6
            Re: SC refuses to hear New York and Connecticut bans onmilitary-style assault weapon

            Originally posted by Ghost1958 View Post
            I dont trust Trump. But as long as we can keep a pro gun pro constitution senate and house SCOTUS nor Pres can do much damage.
            SCOTUS cant make law and can only rule on laws congress passes.
            And congress can repeal any law it wishes too.
            Nor would congress have to replace Scalia if it doesnt they dont want too.
            True, but don't ignore the threat from the states. We have many liberal state legislatures. Just look at Hawaii passing the gun registration law and sharing the info with the Feds.

            Comment


              #7
              Re: SC refuses to hear New York and Connecticut bans onmilitary-style assault weapon

              Originally posted by Pond Scum View Post
              True, but don't ignore the threat from the states. We have many liberal state legislatures. Just look at Hawaii passing the gun registration law and sharing the info with the Feds.
              Yep. And Kalifornia voters will be voting this November whether to do the same thing, along with requiring background checks for ammunition sales and some other gun-control measures.

              Comment


                #8
                Re: SC refuses to hear New York and Connecticut bans onmilitary-style assault weapon

                While i wish there werent communistc states in the U.S. I dont consider a state a threat.
                Voters can oust the scum that are taking their rights or failing that vote with their feet and move to freedom.

                My state is among the top 4 or 5 gun friendly states in the nation.
                An anti gun vote here gets a fast exit from office for the most part and always has.


                However let even FOL be applied to no gun signs for two election cycles and I will pack up sell out and move where there is no FOL .
                Cant leave the entire country as easily.
                You dont have to believe a train is coming to be run over by it.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Re: SC refuses to hear New York and Connecticut bans onmilitary-style assault weapon

                  Originally posted by Ghost1958 View Post
                  While i wish there werent communistc states in the U.S. I dont consider a state a threat..
                  Problem is once they've commified their home state they metastasized to other states, bringing their 'Causes' with them. They need to be Nipped in the Bud, as Barney would say, before there's enough of them in their new state to do permanent damage to it. Sadly Kalifornia is already a lost cause.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X